Geopolitical Newsletter

Weekly Geopolitical News Bulletin: August 23-29, 2025

Written by admin | Aug 30, 2025 2:10:00 AM
 
The Mackinder forum is maintaining a weekly bulletin with the intention of helping our members stay abreast of geopolitical developments around the world.  Currently we search for news across the categories below, but we invite your input on other topics or locations of interest.  

These bulletins are being generated with a combination of cutting-edge AI tools and human input, so please excuse any errors, omissions, or poorly constructed summaries.

If you found this bulletin useful, please feel free to forward it to colleagues or friends who may be interested in geopolitics and strategy.
To receive weekly updates like this, they can sign up for the Mackinder Forum mailing list here.

We’re keeping a spotlight on the latest publications from Mackinder Forum members. If you have a fresh article, paper, or op-ed you’d like featured in future bulletins, please send it our way

📢Upcoming Mackinder Forum Event📢

Highlighted Works by Mackinder Forum Members

  • Ukraine: The War Nobody Knows How to End
    Athanasios G. Platias
    Modern Diplomacy
    August 25, 2025
    moderndiplomacy.eu

  • With the Armenia-Azerbaijan Deal, It’s a New Era in the Caucasus
    Jeffrey Mankoff
    Foreign Policy
    August 26, 2025
    foreignpolicy.com

  • Anti-Trump Geopolitics from a Naval War College Professor
    Francis P. Sempa
    RealClearDefense
    August 25, 2025
    realcleardefense.com

  • Saudi Arabia Taking the Lead in the Middle East
    Kamran Bokhari
    Geopolitical Futures
    August 28, 2025
    geopoliticalfutures.com

Weekly Geopolitical Bulletin (Aug 23–29, 2025)

Geoeconomics

  • U.S.–Japan Tariff Deal Stalls Over Investment Details: Japan’s top trade envoy abruptly canceled a Washington trip to finalize a $550 billion investment package aimed at offsetting U.S. tariffs. The broad July agreement capped American duties on Japanese goods at 15% in exchange for Tokyo’s U.S.-bound investments, but discord persists over terms. President Trump touts it as “our money to invest” – claiming the U.S. would take 90% of profits – while Japanese officials insist projects must also benefit Japan’s interests. The delay underscores simmering friction in the allies’ trade talks despite July’s much-hailed deal.
    reuters.com

  • EU Implements U.S. Trade Pact, Calls It ‘Lesser of Evils’: Brussels moved to enact last month’s EU–U.S. tariff truce by proposing to scrap duties on American industrial goods in return for Washington lowering auto tariffs from 27.5% to 15%. European officials conceded the accord is asymmetrical – the EU must slash most tariffs and boost imports of U.S. energy, while 70% of EU exports still face U.S. duties – but accepted it as the “lesser of evils” to avert Trump’s threatened 30% blanket tariff. The plan, unveiled Aug. 28, aims to lock in the 15% U.S. auto tariff (retroactive to Aug. 1) and prevent a broader transatlantic trade war.
    reuters.com

  • Trump’s 50% Tariffs Slam India, Spur Backlash: The Trump administration doubled tariffs on Indian goods to 50% on Aug. 27, punishing New Delhi for importing Russian oil. The drastic hike – which followed an earlier 25% levy – threatens to batter India’s export sectors and has been denounced as an “own goal” by experts. Indian officials decried being unfairly singled out (noting China and the EU buy more Russian crude) and vowed to endure the pressure by boosting “Made in India” consumption. Economists warn sustained 50% U.S. duties could drag India’s growth below 6%, as U.S. buyers pivot to untariffed rivals.
    theguardian.com

  • Mexico Joins U.S. in Targeting China Trade: In a notable alignment with Washington, Mexico’s government plans to raise tariffs on Chinese imports as part of its 2026 budget, aiming to shield domestic industries and heed U.S. pressure to curb China. According to Bloomberg, the proposed hikes – on goods like cars, textiles and plastics – would “shelter” Mexican manufacturers from subsidized Chinese competition amid a record trade deficit with China. President Claudia Sheinbaum’s administration frames the move as advancing Mexico’s Plan México industrial strategy to reduce reliance on Asia, and as a goodwill gesture before a critical 2026 NAFTA review. (Observers note potential bias in Mexican coverage that lauds satisfying Trump’s longstanding demand while underplaying risks like higher consumer prices.)
    mexiconewsdaily.com.

  • Pakistan Wins New IMF Lifeline Amid Tariff Spat: Facing economic peril, Pakistan secured a fresh $1.4 billion IMF loan (under a climate resilience facility) and the release of a $1 billion tranche from its existing bailout, the Fund’s board announced Aug. 29. The IMF praised Pakistan’s progress stabilizing its $350 billion economy under a tough reform program. Notably, the deal came despite Pakistan’s feud with the U.S.: Islamabad accused Washington of “sabotage” after Trump’s 50% India tariffs (aimed at Russia’s oil trade) strained Pakistan’s IMF review. While India tried to delay aid citing terror-financing concerns, Pakistan’s PM celebrated foiling “India’s attempts to sabotage the IMF program”. (Reuters and regional outlets suggest some bias – Pakistan blames India’s lobbying for its economic woes – yet the IMF’s disbursement signals donor confidence even amid geopolitical crossfire.)
    arabnews.com
    reuters.com

Military Developments

  • Russia Batters Ukraine’s Northeast, Kyiv Endures Missile Carnage: Moscow intensified its offensive on multiple fronts in Ukraine, launching over 1,000 Iranian-made drones and 41 missiles in one week (Aug 21–27) to overwhelm Ukrainian defenses. Russian troops pushed deeper into Kupiansk – a strategic city in Kharkiv region – advancing street-by-street after encircling its outskirts since June. On Aug 28, Russia also struck central Kyiv with a devastating missile salvo that killed at least 14 people in the capital – its deadliest attack there in a month. Britain’s military intelligence assesses that at Russia’s current slow pace, conquering Ukraine’s eastern provinces would take 4.5 years, underscoring a grinding stalemate.
    aljazeera.com
    (Al Jazeera is a global news network financed by the Qatari state).

  • Ukraine Strikes Back – Oil Facilities in Flames on Russian Soil: Kyiv has opened a new front by hitting Russia’s critical infrastructure with deep strikes. In late August, Ukrainian drones and missiles ignited fires at multiple Russian oil facilities, including the Unecha pumping station on the Druzhba pipeline and refineries as far as the Baltic coast. Satellite imagery confirmed one refinery blaze raged for 5 days, destroying six large fuel tanks. By Reuters’ calculations, these raids have knocked out 17% of Russia’s refining capacity (≈1.1 million barrels/day), causing petrol shortages that sent Russian gasoline prices soaring ~38–49% this year. Moscow acknowledged halting some pipeline flows for repairs, while Ukrainian officials hinted such strikes – aimed at choking Russia’s war machine – will continue.
    reuters.com

  • North Korea Debuts New Anti-Air Missiles as U.S. Allies Meet: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un personally oversaw tests of two new surface-to-air missiles on Aug 23, showcasing Pyongyang’s improving air defenses. State media said the missiles demonstrated “fast response” against targets like drones and cruise missiles, and independent analysts note it’s rare for North Korea to unveil air-defense (rather than offensive) systems. The launches came one day before President Trump hosted South Korea’s President Lee in Washington – and amid ongoing U.S.–South Korea military drills that Kim has denounced as hostile. While Pyongyang framed its tests as bolstering deterrence, experts assess the timing as a message of defiance: Kim is demanding sanctions relief and attention, even as he ignores Trump’s overtures to resume nuclear talks.
    aljazeera.com
    (Al Jazeera is a global news network financed by the Qatari State).

  • Israel Hits Houthi Leadership in Yemen Amid Regional War Spillover: In a dramatic escalation beyond Gaza, Israel’s air force struck Houthi rebel targets in Yemen’s capital Sanaa on Aug 28, reportedly killing or wounding several top Houthi leadersr. Israeli intelligence said it targeted safehouses where about 10 senior Houthi officials – including the Houthi “prime minister” Ahmed al-Rahawi and defense chiefs – had gathered to watch their leader’s speech. While the Iran-backed Houthis deny their commanders were hit, Israeli Defense Minister Katz warned that “whoever raises a hand against Israel – his hand will be cut off”. The strikes come after the Houthis repeatedly fired missiles and drones at Israel “in solidarity” with Gaza. (Sources like Reuters confirm Israel is effectively opening a new front against Iran’s proxies in the wider Middle East conflict, even as Houthi media (with obvious bias) claim civilian sites were hit instead.)
    reuters.com

Political and Diplomatic Developments

  • Trump Meets South Korea’s Leader – Talks Trade, Courts Kim Jong Un: South Korea’s new president Lee Jae-myung made his first official visit to Washington on Aug 25, seeking to reinforce the alliance after some public spats. In the Oval Office, Trump praised Lee’s “Art of the Deal” savvy (Lee even read Trump’s memoir to prepare) and both avoided any theatrical confrontations. They touted a July bilateral trade deal – in which Seoul pledged $350 billion of U.S. investments and Korean Air placed a record Boeing order – but still wrangle over issues like nuclear energy cooperation and defense cost-sharing. Notably, Trump publicly declared he’d “like to meet Kim Jong Un this year” for revived U.S.–North Korea talks, even as Pyongyang has stonewalled his overtures and denounced current U.S.–South Korea military drills as preparations to “occupy” the peninsula. Lee welcomed Trump’s peacemaking ambitions – even joking about building a “Trump World” golf resort in a unified Korea – and invited Trump to an Asian summit in Seoul this fall where a rendezvous with Kim could be broached. (Some U.S. observers remain skeptical, noting Kim has rebuffed all engagement since Trump took office and continues missile tests.)
    reuters.com

  • Turkey Cuts All Ties with Israel Over Gaza War: In a dramatic diplomatic rupture, Turkey’s Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan announced on Aug 29 that Ankara has severed all trade and economic relations with Israel and closed Turkey’s airspace and ports to Israeli aircraft and ships. The Erdogan government said the freeze will remain until Israel halts its military operations in Gaza – reflecting Turkey’s fierce condemnation of the war’s toll on Palestinians. This is Turkey’s harshest action against Israel in decades: Fidan boasted Ankara has “totally cut” commerce and denied any transit for Israeli arms. Israeli officials downplayed the impact (Israel’s airlines quickly adjusted routes to avoid Turkey’s skies, and trade had already slowed), but diplomatically it marks a nadir. Context: Turkey, a NATO member, had been gradually normalizing ties with Israel until the Gaza conflict erupted. Now Ankara is pivoting back to championing Palestinian causes, even at cost to its economy. Western diplomats worry Turkey’s hard-line stance – cheered in the Muslim world – could complicate regional peace efforts, though it plays well with Erdogan’s base. (Note: Turkish and Israeli media vary in tone – Turkish outlets cast the move as righteous solidarity with Gaza, while Israeli reports imply it’s largely symbolic – but the facts of airspace and trade closure are confirmed by AP and Ynet.)
    turkishminute.com
    timesofisrael.com

  • Kremlin Rebuffs U.S. Peace Summit Idea for Ukraine: Hopes for a negotiated end to the Ukraine war remain dim. Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told NBC News that President Putin is “not ready” to meet Ukraine’s President Zelensky – rejecting a Trump administration idea of a face-to-face leaders’ summit. Lavrov insisted Ukraine has “said no to everything,” blaming Kyiv for hindering peace by refusing Russia’s terms (like neutrality and territorial concessions). This dismissal – coming as U.S. officials floated a potential Trump–Putin–Zelensky meeting – underscores the diplomatic impasse at 18 months into the war. Meanwhile, Western officials note Putin may be stalling for battlefield gains: British intelligence pointed out Russia’s offensives are plodding and unsustainable. With Putin digging in and Zelensky refusing to cede land, mediators like Turkey and the UN have made no headway beyond narrow humanitarian pauses. The bottom line: absent a major shift on the ground or in Moscow’s calculus, high-level diplomacy is largely frozen, and Moscow’s public rhetoric (via Lavrov) is aimed at portraying Ukraine and the West as unwilling to compromise.
    aljazeera.com

  • E3 Triggers Snapback – Iran Faces New UN Sanctions Showdown: In a coordinated move, Britain, France and Germany formally notified the UN on Aug 28 that they are reimposing sanctions on Iran lifted under the 2015 nuclear deal. The European powers accuse Tehran of flouting the accord by barring full IAEA inspections and advancing its nuclear program (especially after Israel’s June airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites). This “snapback” will restore six UN Security Council resolutions on Oct 18 – reactivating global bans on Iranian arms sales, missile work, and other activities. Notably, Russia and China cannot veto the snapback under the deal’s terms, though Moscow slammed the move and even sought a 6-month delay (with little support). Iran’s government angrily warned of retaliation and had only partially let inspectors back this week, refusing them access to bombed enrichment sites. Diplomatic context: This is the harshest Western step since Trump’s original pullout – likely provoking the worst Iran–EU crisis in years. European officials privately hope the looming sanctions snapback jolts Iran into concessions before October, but many fear it may instead trigger Iranian escalation (Iran’s hardliners already seethe over June’s Israeli-U.S. strikes that reportedly killed over 1,000 Iranians). With the Iran deal’s expiry nearing, a new showdown at the UN is unfolding – and prospects for reviving diplomacy are fading.
    theguardian.com

Geostrategic Flashpoints

  • South China Sea Showdown at Second Thomas Shoal: Tensions spiked at a disputed shoal in the Spratly Islands after China’s coast guard aggressively interfered with a Philippine resupply mission. On August 20, a Chinese coast guard vessel fired a water cannon near the Second Thomas Shoal (Ayungin Shoal) to deter the Philippines from sending provisions to the small Marine garrison stationed on a grounded ship theret. Manila’s defense chief denounced the “provocative” action and noted that Chinese ships – including armed coast guard cutters and militia boats – have been massing (“swarming”) around the shoal. In response, the Philippines is boosting naval patrols and has conducted joint exercises with Australia near the area. Beijing claims the shoal as its territory and argues the Filipinos were bringing in construction materials under the guise of resupply (which Manila denies). This flashpoint exemplifies the broader Sino-Philippine struggle over maritime sovereignty, and it has drawn support for the Philippines from allies like the U.S., Japan, and Australia. (Chinese state media insists the Coast Guard’s actions were lawful in Chinese waters and accuses the Philippines of stage-managing incidents to win international sympathy. Philippine media, unsurprisingly, highlights Chinese aggression. Independent observers note that China’s use of water cannons and “gray zone” tactics is calibrated to intimidate without actual shooting, but the risk of miscalculation is rising.)
    newsweek.com
    inquirer.ne

  • Arctic Tensions and Russian-Chinese Patrols: Russia and China concluded a joint naval patrol through the Arctic’s Northern Sea Route this week – a deployment closely watched by Western militaries. The flotilla, which included at least 10 warships (among them a Russian destroyer and a Chinese cruiser), sailed from the Bering Strait toward Scandinavia over 15 days. While the patrol stayed in international waters, it’s the fifth consecutive year Moscow and Beijing have run such exercises, signaling their growing military cooperation in polar regions. Concurrently, NATO jets were scrambled in the European Arctic after Russian bombers and fighters approached Norwegian airspace. With climate change opening Arctic sea lanes, both East-West competition and the risk of incidents are rising. Western officials have expressed concern that Russia’s huge Arctic military buildup and China’s self-declared status as a “near-Arctic state” could portend attempts to challenge the status quo. (Russian media portrays these patrols as protecting vital Arctic interests and asserts that NATO is the provocateur by increasing its Arctic presence. U.S. and Nordic sources, in contrast, cast the Russian-Chinese patrol as power projection beyond their traditional areas. We cite a U.S. Navy analysis confirming the joint patrol. Readers should note each side in this arena tends to highlight the other’s militarization to justify its own – the reality is a classic security dilemma unfolding in the far north.)
    stripes.com
    news.usni.org

Terrorism and Conflict

  • Pakistan-Afghanistan Border Strikes Fuel Tension: Relations between the Taliban government in Kabul and Pakistan deteriorated further after drone strikes hit eastern Afghanistan on Aug. 27, killing at least 3 people and wounding 7. The Taliban accused Pakistan’s military of carrying out the strikes in Khost and Nangarhar provinces, allegedly targeting hideouts of the Pakistani Taliban (TTP) militant group. Kabul summoned Pakistan’s ambassador and blasted the strikes as a “provocative…barbaric act” that would “have consequences”. Islamabad has not officially commented – in the past, Pakistan has neither confirmed nor denied conducting counter-TTP air raids on Afghan soil. This exchange comes just days after Pakistan, China, and Afghanistan had met and pledged cooperation against terrorism, highlighting the fragile trust. The Pakistani Taliban have intensified attacks inside Pakistan (especially in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province), and Islamabad insists Kabul is harboring the TTP – a charge the Afghan Taliban deny. (Reporting is based on an AP dispatch. Pakistani security sources speaking off-record to local media suggest the strikes indeed hit a TTP camp. This points to a bias in Pakistan’s strategy: it will act unilaterally against TTP threats if it perceives the Taliban aren’t reining them in. The Taliban, on the other hand, are nationalist and resent any violation of Afghan sovereignty, hence their angry rhetoric. The truth is that the TTP presence in Afghanistan is real, putting the Taliban in a bind between ideological loyalty and international pressure.)
    newindianexpress.com

  • Houthi Leadership Hit in Yemen Conflict: In Yemen, the Houthi rebel movement suffered a potential leadership blow amid its conflict with both the Saudi-led coalition and, now, Israel. As mentioned above (see Military Developments), an Israeli strike in Sanaa reportedly killed several top Houthi officials, including the group’s prime minister and defense chief. The Iran-backed Houthis have been firing drones and missiles toward Israel in solidarity with Hamas, effectively opening a new front. The alleged decapitation strike – unprecedented in Israel-Houthi hostilities – has not fully been confirmed by the Houthis (who often initially deny high-profile losses). If true, it could temporarily disrupt Houthi command, but the rebels have shown resilience in their years-long war against Saudi Arabia. The incident underscores how the Israel-Gaza war has entangled other regional actors: beyond Yemen, militias in Iraq and Syria have also targeted U.S. bases in recent weeks. (This item draws on international media and local Yemeni reporting. The Jerusalem Post, an English-language Israeli outlet, first broke the news, likely reflecting the Israeli government’s perspective that the strike was successful. Houthi media’s bias is to project strength and may underreport their losses. The broader context is that Yemen’s civil war and the Israel-Hamas war are intersecting via the Iran nexus – a complexity often missed in quick news updates.)
    jpost.com
    euronews.com

WMD & Cyber Warfare

  • Iranian Hackers Infiltrate Gaza Hostage Talks in Cairo: An Israeli cybersecurity firm revealed a sophisticated Iranian cyber-espionage operation that penetrated high-level negotiations in Cairo over a Gaza ceasefire and hostage exchange. Disclosed in late August, the attack saw Iran’s “Homeland Justice” hacking group compromise an email account at Oman’s Foreign Ministry and send phishing emails – camouflaged as official Oman diplomatic letters – to some 200 recipients including Egyptian officials, U.S. mediators, and Qatari envoys involved in the secret talks. The attached Word documents, once opened, installed malware that allowed Iran to monitor communications in real time: reading negotiators’ emails and even eavesdropping on conversations via device microphones. Cyber analysts call it a striking example of cyber warfare blurring into diplomacy – Tehran effectively turned a legitimate diplomatic channel into a spy tool. Israeli officials suspect Iran aimed to sabotage or gain leverage over any emerging Israel–Hamas deal (Tehran opposes moves that might ease pressure on Israel). The Iranian mission to the UN did not explicitly deny the hack, saying only that “spying accusations” are hypocritical given Western surveillance of Iran. Cybersecurity agencies in the U.S. and UK quietly circulated warnings about the phishing methods used, noting they mirror past Iran-linked campaigns. Significance: This incident underscores Iran’s growing cyber sophistication and willingness to target even allied Arab and Western officials to advance its regional agenda. It also may have contributed to delays – Egyptian and Qatari mediators reportedly experienced unexplained disruptions during the Cairo talks, now plausibly linked to Iran’s cyber interference. *(Sources like JPost and Ynet highlight the Israeli firm’s findings, though Iranian state media hasn’t acknowledged them – the details are credible as multiple security agencies corroborate them in private.)
    jpost.com
    ynetnews.com


  • Global Cyber Alert – Chinese Hackers Target Critical Infrastructure: Western cyber defense agencies issued a joint advisory warning that China-linked hackers have been quietly infiltrating critical infrastructure networks worldwide for espionage. The U.S. Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and counterparts in Five Eyes allies revealed that Chinese state-sponsored groups – equipped with “deep expertise” in target technologies – have compromised telecom networks, power grids, and pipelines across at least 80 countries. These actors often leverage trusted vendor software and use stealth techniques to avoid detection, pre-positioning malware that could be activated in a crisis. The advisory (released Aug 23) details one campaign dubbed “Webworm” in which Chinese operators hijacked the update servers of popular network devices to push malicious firmware to telecom routers – a method allowing persistent backdoors. While Beijing routinely denies hacking accusations, calling them “groundless,” Western officials note this activity “goes beyond traditional spying” – in some cases, compromised systems were left in position to potentially disrupt or sabotage services. The FBI and NSA emphasized that China’s hackers have not just stolen data but could preemptively sow chaos by shutting off power or communications in a conflict scenario. This global alert urges organizations to patch known vulnerabilities and implement zero-trust architectures. It also hints at the geopolitical context: U.S.–China tensions are increasingly playing out in the cyber domain, with each side probing the other’s critical systems. Western intelligence believes China is building an “espionage ecosystem” to feed its strategic aims – stealing intellectual property and preparing the cyber battlespace. Businesses and governments worldwide are advised that no sector is off-limits and to stay vigilant, as the scope of Chinese cyber operations now rivals – and in some domains exceeds – that of Russia.
    cybersecuritydive.com
    washingtonpost.com